Objectives: This study was to evaluate
and compare the fast fracture strength and fracture toughness of several
commercially available materials for provisional applications.
Methods: An anatomically-correct three-unit
posterior bridge design, with 5X5mm connectors, was selected for fast fracture
strength testing. The force required to fracture the bridge was measured by
applying a load with an Instron on a steel ball, which was balanced between the
buccal and lingual cusps of the 1st molar pontic. To determine the
effect of thermocycling on fast fracture, specimens with 4X5mm connectors were
prepared, where the half of samples were thermocycled and fractured, and the
other half was tested as control. Thermocycled specimens underwent 1,500
cycles between 5°C and 55°C water baths. To determine Kmax, notched
fracture toughness specimens (4mmx8mmx40mm) were prepared and tested according to
ISO20795-2, where a pre-notched specimen was loaded in a 3-point bend. All
materials were prepared according to manufacturers' instructions. Mechanical
properties of each material were statistically compared by ANOVA (a = 0.05).
Results: Statistically analysis
(ANOVA a = 0.05) shows that the fast
fracture strength and fracture toughness of Radica™ were superior to those of Jet acrylic, and Integrity™. There was no significant difference in the fast fracture strengths
of Radica™ specimens prior to (800±150N) and after thermocycled (760±220N).
Fast Fracture Strength and Fracture
Toughness of Various Materials (5X5mm)
Material | Fast Fracture Strength (N) | Fracture Toughness Kmax (MPa*M1/2) | Radica™ Dentin (Dentsply) | 1,450±135 | 1.75±0.24 | Jet Acrylic (Lang) | 720±85 | 1.43±0.15 | Integrity™ (Dentsply) | 740±110 | 1.33±0.24 |
Conclusion: The fast fracture
strength and fracture toughness of Radica™ are
higher than those established commercial provisional materials Jet acrylic and
Integrity™. Thermocycling of the Radica™ specimens was shown to have no affect on their fracture
strengths.
|