website: AADR 37th Annual Meeting

ABSTRACT: 0538  

Variation in restoration survival rates among individual dentists

F.J.T. BURKE, University of Birmingham, England, Uk, and S. LUCAROTTI, NHS Business Services Authority, Eastbourne

Dental treatment within the General Dental Services (GDS) is administered in England/Wales by the NHS Business Services Authority (Dental Service Division (DSD)), which holds detailed treatment records.

Objectives: This study reports the variation in one-year restoration survival rates between 382 dentists practising in the West Midlands region of England.

Methods: For this study, the data were restricted to patients aged between 40 and 59 years, and to dentists practising within the West Midlands Strategic Health Authority who placed >200 MO or DO restorations in the 2 years to 30 March 2007. For each direct restoration placed, the subsequent history of that tooth was consulted and one-year survival to next intervention calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Variation between the dentists was tested by a Log-Rank test. A similar analysis was carried out on MOD amalgam and resin composite restorations by the same dentists and the results correlated against those for MO/DO restorations.

Results: 382 dentists fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They placed over 120,000 MO/DO amalgam restorations. For these restorations, the dentists' survival rates were significantly different, and the distribution was skewed, with the highest frequency occurring at 92% survival but with survival rates as high as 100% and as low as 64% being recorded. A similar pattern emerged for composite restorations, although three dentists recorded survival rates of less than 50%. For MOD amalgams, the survival function histogram was flatter than for MO/DO restorations. One-year survival for MO/DO restorations was significantly correlated with survival for MOD (r=0.805) and survival for composite restorations (r=0.491).

Conclusion: For a sample of UK dentists, there is substantial variation in the survival of restorations that they placed in a two-year period, and significant correlation between dentists' restoration survival for different types of direct restoration.

Acknowledgment: The support of the BSA (DSD) is acknowledged.

Back to Top