 |
 |
 |
 |
Photoelastic Stress Comparison of Three Different Post Systems
S. SHARMA1, G. KUGEL2, G. GREYSTONE2, and P. STARK2, 1Tufts University School Of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA, 2Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA | Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the stress magnitude of a novel post versus two different post systems. Methods: A total of 30 canals were prepared in a photo elastic material (PSM 1, Vishay Measurements Group). The canals were divided into three groups: Spirapost (Zenith/DMG)—Group 1; Flexi Post (Essential Dental Systems)—Group 2; and Fiber Post (Bisco,)—Group 3. Luxacore (Zenith/DMG) was used to cement the posts and cores. The cores were built using size 6 copper bands. Each sample was subjected to 30 kilograms of stress twice: once at an incline of 30 degrees and once vertically; using an Instron machine (model 4202). Three areas were chosen in which to measure the stress: lateral right, lateral left and apical areas of the post region. The magnitude of the stress was then analyzed by measuring the fringe orders with a null balance compensator under a polariscope (Model 080 series Teaching Polariscope system, Vishay Measurements). The data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Scheffe's test. Results: The magnitude of stress in Group 1 was significantly lower (p<0.05) than Groups 2 and 3 on lateral left and apical areas. There was no difference on the lateral right areas between Groups 1 and 2 (p>0.05). A significant difference was noted only at the apical area when comparing Groups 2 and 3. Conclusion: Overall, the statistical analysis of the test results showed that the mean values of the stress caused by Group 1 (Spirapost) were significantly lower than those of Groups 2 (Flexi Post) and 3 (Fiber Post). Supported by a grant from Zenith Dental /DMG |
Seq #151 - Cutting, Finishing, Polishing, Endodontic Posts, New Treatment Devices, Impression Mixers 10:45 AM-12:00 PM, Saturday, April 5, 2008 Hilton Anatole Hotel Trinity I - Exhibit Hall |
Back to the Dental Materials 9 : Instruments and Equipment Program
|
|