Dental
tooth pastes and topical pastes with remineralizing properties have been
introduced to the market to help prevent demineralization that eventually may result
in dental caries or erosion.
Objective: To determine the effect of two types of remineralizing
paste on the microhardness of demineralized
human enamel.
Methods: Eighteen extracted teeth were mounted on acrylic-cylinders so that the occlusal surface was exposed. The
surface was polished using SiC paper. A groove
was made on the acrylic rings to divide exposed enamel of each tooth into two
halves. Thirty-six enamel surfaces were available. Twelve surfaces
were randomly assigned for treating with WhiteLasting
Tooth Whitening gel (WL: Frontier Pharmaceutical, NY, USA) containing calcium lactate, trisodium phosphate and
fluoride, a PROSPEC™ MI paste (MI: GC America,
IL, USA) containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), or water as a control. Remineralizing treatment was applied for 20 minutes
twice daily for three days. Knoop microhardness was determined at three areas at 500 microns from the edge with a microhardness tester (FM-7, Future-Tech, Tokyo, Japan) on three opportunities: prior treatment, after 15 hours
immersion in Diet Coke®, and
after treatment with the pastes. The data were statistically analyzed using paired t-test and one-way ANOVA/Tukey's test (a = 0.05).
Results:
Means (SD) for Knoop microhardness are as follows [identical letters indicate no statistical
differences (p>0.05)]:
| Baseline | After Demineralization | After Treatment | WL | 260a (31) | 121d (34) | 211b (40) | MI | 253a (27) | 134cd (22) | 206b (35) | Water | 259a (26) | 135cd (24) | 167c (26) |
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, both pastes
tested showed significant increase in microhardness of the demineralized
enamel; however, the increase in the hardness of
the enamel did not reach the pre-demineralization
levels.
|