Bioactive glasses in dentin that reduce leakage maintain bond strength
D. ZEIGER1, S.J. MARSHALL1, L.G. WATANABE2, K. SAEKI3, A. TOMSIA4, E. SAIZ4, and G.W. MARSHALL1, 1University of California, San Francisco, USA, 2University of California - San Francisco, USA, 3University of California San Francisco, USA, 4Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, CA, USA | Bonded
restorations have one major drawback, leakage. Previous studies (IADR 2007,
CED-IADR 2007) showed that bioactive glasses that form apatite in calcium- and
phosphate-containing environments diminished leakage in vitro.
Objective: Test the hypothesis that powdered bioactive glasses that reduce
leakage in resin-bonded dentin have no deleterious effects on bond strength.
Methods: Coronal dentin of human third molars was finished to 320 grit,
etched, and rinsed. Slurries of 10% (w/v) bioactive glass in ethanol, either
of Hench's Bioglass® formula 45S5 or of a novel F- and Mg-containing
bioactive glass (“F glass”), of average particle size 1µm, were
vacuum-deposited in the etched dentin. Adhesive (Single Bond, 3M/ESPE) and
composite (Z250, 3M/ESPE) were applied and light-cured. Samples (N=6/group) were
stored overnight, for 8d, or for 65d in deionized water at 37°C. Single
Plane Lap Shear Bond Strength was determined at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min.
Results:
| Overnight | 8 Days | 65 Days | | | Mean±SD (MPa) | | Mean±SD (MPa) | | Mean±SD (MPa) | Negative Control | | 31.4±11.1 | | 38.6±6.6 | | 29.2±11.7 | F Glass | | 41.9±3.6 | | 36.2±6.0 | | 38.6±6.4 | 45S5 | | 37.6±7.3 | | 40.8±9.0 | | 31.7±14.2 | | | p=0.10 | | p=0.57 | | p=0.35 |
Bond
strengths were not significantly different at any of the three time points
(overnight, p=0.10; 8 days, p=0.57; 65 days, p=0.35, one-way ANOVA). Bond
strengths did not differ significantly over time for each individual treatment
(negative controls, p=0.27; F glass-treated samples, p=0.22; 45S5-treated
teeth, p=0.35). Failure tended to be largely cohesive in dentin or composite
for glass-treated samples, compared to adhesive failure in the interface for
negative controls. Conclusions: Ground bioactive glass of different
formulations that had been previously shown to reduce leakage at
bonded interfaces was effectively integrated into the resin bonding process,
and allowed the resin to permeate dentin with no decrease in bond strength. Support:
NIH/NIDCR Grant P01DE09859.
|
Seq #32 - Keynote Address, Testing and Durability of the Adhesive Interface 9:45 AM-11:15 AM, Thursday, April 3, 2008 Hilton Anatole Hotel Grand Ballroom D |
Back to the Dental Materials 1: Adhesion - Bond Strength Testing and Mechanisms Program
|
|