 |
 |
 |
 |
Evaluation of Plaque Biofilm Kill Activity of Representative Global Mouthrinses
P. PAN1, R. LUX2, W. SHI2, L. LI2, S.D. CASTANEDA2, C.M. FULLEM1, and M.W.B. ARAUJO1, 1Johnson & Johnson Consumer & Personal Products Worldwide, Division of Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc, Morris Plains, NJ, USA, 2University of California - Los Angeles, USA | AADR Abstracts 1. Evaluation of Plaque Biofilm Kill Activity of
Representative Global Mouthrinses Objective: Two studies were conducted to compare the
killing activity of Listerine Antiseptic Mouthwash (LMW) with three Plax
antiseptic mouthrinses containing 0.05% CPC: Overnight (PO), Cool Mint (PCM)
and Soft Mint (PSM), in a previously established saliva-derived biofilm
model. Methods: Unstimulated saliva was collected, pooled, diluted in
BHI supplemented with 1% sucrose, 1% mannose and 1% glucose, and centrifuged
(10min @ 2,000rpm) to remove large particles. The microorganism containing
supernatant was inoculated into chambered coverglasses and incubated overnight
in an anaerobic chamber (N2 85%, H2 10%, CO2
5%, 37°C). After incubation the growth medium was exchanged for fresh medium.
Growth continued to reach a total of 16-18 hrs for single dose treatment or to
maturity for repeated treatments. Growth medium was removed and biofilms were
washed before being treated with the respective mouthrinses (100µl for 30
or 60s). 25% microorganism-free saliva in BSA-saline and 70% EtOH served as
negative and positive controls respectively. Biofilms undergoing two treatments
were grown anaerobically (6hr) between treatments. Treatment effectiveness was
quantified using image analysis software and proportion of damaged/dead cells
was calculated. Results: LMW demonstrated statistically significantly
greater killing activity than Plax mouthrinses at 2x30 and 2x60s in study I and
study II. All other treatment tested also showed statically significant
differences between the groups.
% Dead/Damaged Cells After Treatment | Study I | Treatment | 1x30s | 1x60s | 2x30s | LMW | 22.2±2.3 | 64.9±14.5 | 19.4±5.4 | PSM | 7.5±3.5 (p<.0001) | 21.5±7.4 (p<.0001) | 9.4±3.9 (p<.0002) | PCM | 12.9±3.5 (p<.0001) | 20.1±8.1 (p<.0001) | 9.6±3.3 (p<.0001) | Study II | Treatment | 2x30s | 2x60s | LMW | 19.5±7.5 | 26.7±11.1 | PO | 11.2±5.1 (p<.014) | 13.5±3.5 (p<.034) | | | | | | |
Conclusions: Both confocal imaging and quantitative
analyses via live-dead staining of biofilms demonstrated that LMW was up to two
times more effective in biofilm killing than PO, PCM and PSM.
|
Seq #10 - Oral Disease and Systemic Health 3:15 PM-4:45 PM, Wednesday, April 2, 2008 Hilton Anatole Hotel Miro |
Back to the Oral Health Research Program
|
|