website: AADR 37th Annual Meeting

ABSTRACT: 0209  

Alternative surface treatment of an indirect composite resin by MTBS

S.M.A. MICHIDA, R.O.D.A. SOUZA, F.E. TAKAHASHI, P.C. PEREIRA, D.C. BARCA, and F.C. PEL"GIA, UNESP SJC, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil

Objective: to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of an indirect composite resin (ICR) to a resin cement, after surface treatment with 10% hydrofluoridric acid (HF) and thermocycling. Methods: an acrylic block (6 x 6 x 6mm) was molded with polivinilsiloxane obtaining a mold to build 30 blocks of ICR (Vita VMLC) according to manufacturerxs instructions. The blocks were divided in 6 groups (n=5): G1 (negative control): without HF; G2: HF 60s; G3: HF 90s; G4: HF 120s; G5: HF 180s; G6 (positive control): sandblasting (Cojet Sand) (10 s,10 mm of distance, 2.8 bars of pressure); washed with distilled water and dried with air. 30 blocks of direct composed resin (DCR) (W3D) were built obtaining a block of RCD for each block of RCI. On RCI block surface was applied silane (Monobond-S), adhesive (Excites DSC) and it was cemented to RCD blocks by resin cement (Variolink II) under load of 750g. They were stored in distilled water (37șC/24hs). The blocks were cut in machine obtaining 9 samples (n=9) with cross section area of 0,64mm2, submitted to thermocycling (6000 cycles, 5șC to 55șC, 30s). Each sample was set in a caliper adapted to an universal machine with speed of 1mm/min. Results: ANOVA (a=0.05) showed that the bond strength was not affected by the surface treatment (p>0.05). It was verified that G5 (41.86±7.01b) was statistical different from G1 (35.64±4.95a); and G2 (40.20±5.63a), G3 (40.96±5.18a), G4 (40.61±3.17a) was statistical different from G6 (47.38±6.12b) (Dunnet test). Conclusion: the surface treatment with HF 180s of the indirect composite produced the highest values of microtensile bond strength to a resin cement after thermocycling.

Back to Top