website: AADR 37th Annual Meeting

ABSTRACT: 1108  

Evaluation of a New Temporary Lining Material

M. HASHIGUCHI1, A. TERAKADO1, F. UKAJI1, and H. KAZAMA2, 1Tokuyama Dental Corporation, Tsukuba, Japan, 2Tokuyama Dental Corp, Tsukuba, Japan

Objectives: Temporary resilient lining materials (tissue conditioners) containing methacrylate polymer and plasticizer are widely used for improvement of the health of a soft tissue in the denture-bearing areas. However, softness of this material is well-known to be lost within the few days due to the elution of the low-molecular-weight plasticizer into the mouth. A new temporary lining material (TissueCare, TC) containing liquid high-molecular polyacrylate as a non-bleeding plasticizer was developed. The purpose was to evaluate the softness and its durability of TC compared with that of commercial temporary lining materials.

Methods: Shore A hardness of TC as well as the commercial temporary resilient lining materials (Lynal, LY; COE-COMFORT, CC; Softone, ST; Visco-gel, VG) was measured. Specimens (9-mm diameter x 12 mm) were immersed in water at 37 C for 4 weeks and measured for Shore A hardness (ISO 7619-1) once per week.

Results: Means (sd, n=3) of Shore A hardness are summarized below. There was only slight variation of hardness in TC compared with other tissue conditioners.

Products

Hardness (Shore A)

24 hours

2 weeks

4 weeks

TC

11(0.6)

13(0.6)

13(0.6)

LY

22(0.6)

28(1.0)

34(0.6)

CC

6(0)

30(0.6)

38(0.6)

ST

7(0.6)

29(0.6)

31(1.0)

VG

8(0.6)

22(1.2)

28(0.6)

The results showed TC maintained softness for a longer period than other commercial tissue conditioners. It can be assumed that polymeric plasticizer chain was entangled and caught in a methacrylic matrix, which caused reduced leaching.

Conclusions: TC maintained low Shore A hardness during storage in water over a period of 4 weeks compared with other tissue conditioners.

Back to Top