|
|
|
|
Plaque Biofilm Penetration by Essential-Oil and Cpc Containing Mouthrinses
M.W.B. ARAUJO1, P. PAN1, R. LUX2, and W. SHI2, 1Johnson & Johnson Consumer & Personal Products Worldwide, Division of Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc, Morris Plains, NJ, USA, 2University of California - Los Angeles, USA | Objective: To compare the
killing activity of the antiseptic mouthrinses LISTERINE® Antiseptic
Mouthwash (LMW) (Morris Plains, NJ, USA) and PLAX® Overnight®
(PO) (Colgate-Palmolive, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil) containing 0.05% CPC and
alcohol in a previously established saliva-derived in vitro biofilm
model. Methods: Unstimulated saliva was collected, pooled, diluted in
BHI, centrifuged (10min @ 2,000rpm), inoculated into cover glasses and
incubated overnight in anaerobic chamber (N2 85%, H2 10%,
CO2 5%, 37°C). After incubation growth medium was exchanged for
fresh medium and every 12 hrs thereafter until the biofilms reached maturity.
Growth medium was removed and biofilms were washed than treated with respective
mouthrinses (100µl for 30s or 60s). 25% microorganism-free saliva in BSA
(bovine serum albumin)-saline (0.25% BSA, 0.15M NaCl) and 70% EtOH served as
negative and positive controls respectively. Biofilms were washed (3x), grown
anaerobically (1hr) and washed again (3x) every hour for 6hrs and then treated
again as described above. All 8 possible treatments were performed on the same
slide. Biofilms were labeled and fluorescence was observed with a confocal
laser scanning microscope. Treatment effectiveness was quantified using image
analysis software and proportion of damaged/dead cells was calculated. Results:
LMW demonstrated statistically significantly greater killing activity than PO for both 2x30s and 2x60s exposures with respective rinses with p<0.0001.
Additionally, in accordance with label recommendations 2x30s treatment with LMW
demonstrated statistically significantly greater killing than 2x60s with PO
with p<0.0001.
Listerine (2x30s) | Plax (2X60s) | EtOH (2X30s) | EtOH (2X60s) | Buffer (2X30s) | Buffer (2X60s) | 20.8%±6.2 | 10.8%±3.7* | 29.0%±17.9* | 43.3%±9.3* | 3.4%±2.9* | 3.5%±2.6* |
*p<0.0001
Conclusions: Both confocal
imaging and quantitative analyses via live-dead staining of biofilms
demonstrated that LMW was up to two times more effective in biofilm killing
than PO when following label recommendations. The present study replicates
results from other studies using similar and other biofilm kill kinetics
methodology.
| Seq #62 - Plaque Biofilm Control, Gingival Health Management 10:45 AM-12:15 PM, Thursday, July 3, 2008 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Room 709 |
Back to the Oral Health Research Program
|
|