J.L. DURACK1, C. HUDSON1, B. KUPPERMANN2, and T. KLETTKE2, 13M ESPE, London, Canada, 23M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany |
Objectives: Clinical success of precision impression
materials is strongly dependent on the flow of the unset impression material. Flow
is an especially important property when syringing in moist areas, like the
gingival sulcus, and is needed for a detailed impression. Methods: Gun-delivered tray materials were investigated: experimental
Impregum Tray Material regular-set (IPr, 3M ESPE, #B304552, #C304560),
experimental Impregum Tray Material fast-set (IPf, 3M ESPE, #B304551, #C304560),
Honigum Mono (Ho, DMG, #589776), Flexitime Monophase (Flx, Heraeus-Kulzer,
#285195), Aquasil Ultra Monophase (AqU, Dentsply, #070815), Affinis Monobody
(Aff, Coltene, #0138005). Measurements were done according to a published method (#3083 and
#3048 IADR 2005) 25 seconds after start of mix and at the end of working time
as recommended by the impression material manufacturer. Results: Mean values and standard deviations are given
(n=5). Results were analyzed by one-way-ANOVA and Tukey-test (p<0.05).
Impression Material | Height shark fin [mm] (SD) | 25 sec | End working time | IPr | 16.5(0.5) | 10.9(0.5) | IPf | 17.5(0.5) | 13.7(0.3) | Ho | 2.8(0.3)* | 0.8(0.3)* | Flx | 2.2(0.3)* | 1.1(0.2)* | AqU | 10.5(0.5) | 2.2(0.3) | Aff | 3.8(0.3) | 1.1(0.2)* |
* Means are not significantly different. Conclusions: IPr and IPf showed best results in flow after
25 seconds and were also superior at the end of working time. Based on these measurements,
IPr and IPf would be expected to show a high degree of clinical reliability.
|