Objectives: This study has been designed to evaluate
the rotational resistance form of a simulated-fixed partial denture (FPD). The
maximum axial wall inclinations needed to resist rotation of the FPD around
axes adjacent to the abutments were determined.
Methods: Two simulated-FPD mandibular posterior abutment
preparations were represented by 2-dimensional geometric figures (sagittal
plane). Each abutment preparation consisted of known parameters: vertical
height (H=3, 4, 5mm), base widths (BPremolar=6mm, BMolar=9mm,
BFPD=24mm). A simulated-1stmolar-pontic was a
rectangular bar-connector with the same horizontal dimension as the 2ndmolar
abutment. The maximal mesial- & distal-axial wall inclinations of each
abutment (MPremolar, DPremolar, M2ndMolar, D2ndMolar
in degrees) for resistance to rotation were the dependent variables. The maximal
abutment inclinations (Alpha) were calculated with the following
formula: Alpha = ˝ [Arc Sine (H/B)]; derivation previously published
Bowley et al, J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:547. The analysis was
performed for rotation around two separate axes at the mesial margin of the premolar
and the distal margin of the 2ndmolar (Axis-D2ndMolar/-MPremolar)
in two rotational directions, Anterior-Posterior (A-P) and Posterior-Anterior
(P-A). The significance-level was established ≤6-degrees due to the high-level
of clinical difficulty to accomplish this axial wall angulation.
Results:
A-P&P-A Rotation,B-24mm (Axis-MPremolar/-D2ndMolar) | Alpha (MPremolar&D2ndMolar, degrees) | Sig. | H-3mm | 3.6 | s | H-4mm | 4.5 | s | H-5mm | 6.0 | s | A-P Rotation,B-9mm (Axis-MPremolar) | (M2ndMolar, degrees) | | H-3mm | 9.6 | ns ‡ | H-4mm | 13.2 | ns ‡ | H-5mm | 16.0 | ns ‡ | P-A Rotation,B-6mm (Axis-MPremolar) | (DPremolar, degrees) | | H-3mm | 15.0 | ns ‡ | H-4mm | 20.9 | ns ‡ | H-5mm | 28.2 | ns ‡ |
‡ Minimum
wall inclination to provide resistance to rotation & assist/offset
MPremolar/
D2ndMolar axial wall-inclination resistance.
Conclusions: MPremolar/ D2ndMolar
FPD abutment axial wall inclinations greater than 6-degrees would demonstrate a
lack of rotational resistance at all abutment H-levels. Two other axial walls,
M2ndMolar & DPremolar, provide rotational resistance
to offset the other MPremolar/ D2ndMolar deficient walls,
at greater inclinations, 9.6-28.2 degrees.
|