Y.-P. PAN1, M.-J. JOU1, M.-G. TU2, L.-J. FUH2, C.-W. LIN1, and T.-N. WU1, 1China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, 2China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan |
Objectives:
To evaluate how the effects of file sizes affect the accuracy of the Elements
Diagnostic apex locator in determining the working lengths of root canals in alginate
models with various water contents.
Methods:
Fifteen extracted single-rooted teeth were prepared, cleaned, and shaped, with
apical constriction up to size #30. Specimens were embedded in alginate models
constructed by sequential alginate dehydration for up to 15 hrs. The distance
from the incisor edge to the major foramen of the root apex indicated the
actual tooth length (AL). The electronically determined length (EDL) was
measured by a K-file inserted into the root canal to a point just beyond the
major foramen, and then withdrawn counter-clockwise until a flashing bar
appeared at the "0.0" of the Elements Diagnostic unit (Sybron Endo, Anaheim, CA, USA). Four different sizes of K-files (#10, #15, #20, and #25) were used for
the measurements. The subtraction difference (SD) between AL and EDL was recorded
for each tooth. The % of water content in alginate and the SD values at three
measuring timepoints in each file-size group were then compared by Student's t
test.
Results:
There was an average SD (0.69 mm) (min, 0.67 mm; max, 0.70 mm) displayed in the
size #15 file regardless of the change in alginate water content from 66.2% to
65.94%. However, variations of SD (0.68-0.74 mm) in size #10, 0.58-0.66 mm in
size #20, and 0.52-0.65 mm in size #25 were found when the alginate water
content (66.2%) decreased to 65.94%.
Conclusions: When
file size increased, the EDL reading was shorter in specimens with the same alginate
water content. The Elements Diagnostic apex locator provided a consistent 0.69-mm
short to the actual tooth length in a 0.30-mm-diameter constriction of the
canals, with a size #15 file, when the water content of alginate was within
66.2% to 65.94%.
|