website: 86th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR

ABSTRACT: 0374  

Effects of Saliva Contamination on Bond Strength of Luting Cements

C.W.M. CHUNG1, C. YIU2, N.M. KING1, and N. HIRAISHI1, 1The University of Hong Kong, China, 2Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Objectives: To examine the effect of saliva contamination and decontamination methods on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of resin luting cements to human dentin.

Methods: Dentin surfaces from fifty extracted human third molars were abraded with 600-grit SiC paper. For RelyX ARC (ARC: 3M ESPE), the dentin surfaces were treated with 32% phosphoric acid (Uni-Etch, Bisco) and the subgroups were: ARC-control (uncontaminated), ARC-I (saliva contamination, blot dried), ARC-II (saliva contamination, rinse, blot dried) and ARC-III (saliva contamination, rinse, re-etch, rinse, blot dried). For Panavia F (PF: Kuraray), the subgroups were: PF-control (uncontaminated), PF-I (saliva contamination, dried), PF-II (saliva contamination, rinse, dried), PF-III (primer, saliva contamination, dried), PF-IV (primer, saliva contamination, dried, primer re-applied) and PF-V (primer, saliva contamination, rinse, dried, primer re-applied). Cylindrical composite blocks were luted onto dentin using the two cements. The bonded specimens were stored at 37°C for 24h and sectioned into 0.9x0.9mm beams for µTBS testing. The data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test (p<0.05).

Results: Microtensile bond strength (MPa, Mean ± SD, N=40).

Surface treatment

RelyX ARC

Surface treatment

Panavia F 2.0

ARC-control

23.82±2.73 A

PF-control

24.04±2.94 A

ARC-I

20.57±3.76 B

PF-I

14.78±2.86 C

ARC-II

23.87±2.74 A

PF-II

20.50±3.38 B

ARC-III

17.42±3.49 C

PF-III

12.95±4.32 C

PF-IV

8.05±3.65 D

PF-V

18.46±4.33 B

*column with different letters indicates statistically significant differences.

Groups ARC-I and ARC-III showed statistically significant lower µTBS than ARC-control and ARC-II (p<0.005). All PF subgroups had significantly lower µTBS than the control (p<0.005).

 

Conclusion: Saliva contamination during luting deteriorated the bond quality of resin cements. Decontamination by rinsing with water was effective for restoring the bond strength of ARC, while re-etching decreased the bond strength. For PF, decontamination by rinsing with water and re-application of primer after rinsing improved the bond strength.

Supported by HKU Grant no. 10207402.07840.08004.323.01

Back to Top