website: 86th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR

ABSTRACT: 1486  

Application Technique Determines Marginal Seal of Class II Composite Restorations

N. HOFMANN1, C. ZENTGRAF2, and B. KLAIBER1, 1University of Wuerzburg, Germany, 2Private practice, Wuerzburg, Germany

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of cavity depth, polymerization shrinkage and application technique on marginal seal and margin quality of class II resin-based composite restorations.

Methods: Standardized MOD class II cavities were prepared in extracted human molars. Occlusal boxes were 3.5mm wide and either 3mm or 4.5mm deep. Standardized interproximal boxes (box size: 3.5x4.5mm, bevel size 5.5x5.5mm) were prepared using sonic shape preparation instruments (SonicSys Approx Size 3) and reciprocating files (Bevelshape B15C). After application of a 3-step etch&rinse adhesive (Optibond FL), the cavities were restored using a resin-based composite of high (Tetric Ceram, 2.8%) or low polymerization shrinkage (Grandio, 1.6%). Interproximal boxes were restored using either a centripetal [CP] or a horizontal [Hor] layering technique. After water storage (30 days, 37°C) and thermocycling (2500x 5-55°C), margin quality was evaluated in the SEM using the replica technique. Marginal seal was studied using dye penetration (AgNO3 50%, 2h, 37°C). For each combination of parameters six specimens were prepared. Results were analyzed using 3-way ANOVA.

Results: All data: means ± SD

Cavity size

small

deep

Shrinkage

high

low

high

low

Layering technique

CP

Hor

CP

Hor

CP

Hor

CP

Hor

Penetration depth1 [mm]

0.09 ±0.13

0.7 6±0.4

0.23 ±0.22

0.44 ±0.27

0.27 ±0.34

0.68 ±0.33

0.43 ±0.58

0.36 ±0.32

Margin gap1 [%]

19.6 ±26.7

88.0 ±12.8

50.1 ±26.4

47.9 ±13.4

15.6 ±12.1

66.4 ±18.9

58.8 ±31.6

72.9 ±19.9

1at cervical margins

The centripetal layering technique produced less dye penetration (P<0.01) and margin gaps (P<0.001) than the horizontal layering technique. This difference was more pronounced for the high shrinkage composite (interaction: P<0.05 / P<0.001). In deep cavities, more margin gaps were observed for the low shrinkage composite, whereas both composites were equivalent in small cavities (interaction: P<0.01).

Conclusions: The centripetal layering technique may improve marginal seal, at least for high shrinkage resin-based composites.

Back to Top