C. BRACHO-TROCONIS, S. RUDOLPH, J. BOULDEN, and N. WONG, Septodont, Confi-Dental Division, Louisville, CO, USA |
Experimental
low stress, nanohybrid composites were prepared using different methacrylate-thiol-ene
resin systems designed at the University of Colorado, Boulder, USA. Thiol-ene polymerizations are step growth reactions, leading to a low volumetric shrinkage and shrinkage
stress. These properties make Thiol-enes an alternative for dental applications.
Objectives:
To
determine the Physical Properties of experimental Methacrylate-Thiol-ene based
composites compared to Bis-GMA based resin (Filtek Supreme Plus, 3M-ESPE) and dimer
acid based resin (N'Durance®, Septodont) nanohybrid composites.
Methods: Compressive and
flexural strength, flexural modulus, water sorption and solubility were determined
according to the International Standard ISO 4049 and ADA specification 27.
Diametral Tensile Strength (DTS) was measured using a similar test method as
compressive strength. Monomer conversion was calculated by near-IR. The polymerization
shrinkage was measured using a linometer from ACTA. Shrinkage stress was
measured with an ADAHF Tensometer. Wear resistance was measured using the ACTA
machine. Specimens were polymerized using a quartz-tungsten-halogen lamp with
an intensity of 500 mW/cm2, during 40 or 20 seconds
according to the test.
Results:
Physical Criteria | THIOL-1 | THIOL-2 | N'Durance | Filtek Supreme Plus | Compressive strength, MPa | 279±23 | 300±28 | 319±20 | 271±51 | DTS, MPa | 49.01±4.54 | 45.85±3.89 | 52.01±2.93 | 60.00±2.10 | Flexural strength, MPa | 135±19 | 134±14 | 125±9 | 124±16 | Flexural modulus, GPa | 11.07±7.69 | 9.93±1.24 | 8.50±7.01 | 12.04±3.65 | C=C conversion, % | 66.73 | 59.91 | 75.01±1.53 | 47.20±6.53 | Polymerization Shrinkage, % | 2.52±0.30 | 2.56±0.31 | 1.39±0.35 | 1.90±0.17 | Shrinkage stress, MPa | 1.50±0.24 | 1.29±0.35 | 1.47±0.10 | 2.00±0.45 | Water sorption, microgram/mm3 | 17.53±3.62 | 17.92±2.02 | 7.19±0.70 | 28.45±0.95 | Water solubility, microgram/mm3 | 0.00±0.77 | 0.00±0.49 | 0.00±0.02 | 0.52±0.06 | Wear resistance relative to Z250 at 2 months | 0.99±0.33 | 1.28±0.10 | 1.09±0.33 | 0.69±0.10 |
Conclusions: The thiol-ene based
monomer system contributes to reducing the stress at the bonding interface with
the tooth, while maintaining a high intrinsic strength. Further research is
necessary in order to lower the volumetric shrinkage. This decrease should lead
to an additional decrease in shrinkage stress.
|