website: 86th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR

ABSTRACT: 1057  

In Vitro Wear of Experimental Fluoride-releasing Dental Composite

Y. WANG1, L. LING1, X. XU1, L. CHEN1, D. CAKIR2, and J.O. BURGESS2, 1Louisiana State University, New Orleans, USA, 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA

Objectives: 1) to evaluate the wear resistance of an experimental fluoride-releasing composite (Expt) and compared it with a control composite and a commercial composite Venus (Heraeus Kulzer) using an in vitro three-body wear tester (Leinfelder simulator, Caulk/Dentsply); 2) to investigate the correlation between two wear measurement methods: FTSS stylus and laser scanner. Methods: The experimental and control composites were formulated using 70wt% silanized fluoroaluminosilicate filler (mean 1.3µm, Caulk/Dentsply) and 30wt% monomers (Control: BisGMA:EBPADMA:HDDMA 40:40:20, Expt: BisGMA:EBPADMA:HDDMA:F-releasing-monomer 30:30:20:20). The three composites (n=8) were placed into cylindrical cavities 4x3mm prepared in Macor cylinders (14x12mm, Ceramic Products) and light cured for 40s. The specimens were finished with 5-micron alumina slurry. The wear test was conducted using a polymer-bead slurry (15g+9ml H2O) and 8 kg pressure for 400,000 cycles. The wear volumes and maximum wear depths were measured using a 3D profilometer (TalyScan 150, Taylor Hobson) with two scanners: FSTT stylus and laser under the same scan speed (2000 mm/s). The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's B tests. Results: (mean ± SD)

FTSS Stylus Scanner

Laser Scanner

Materials

Max. Depth (mm)

Wear Volume (mm3)

Max. Depth (mm)

Wear Volume (mm3)

Control

0.0813 ± 0.016

0.0304 ± 0.0159

0.0873 ± 0.0091

0.0234 ± 0.0130

Expt

0.0951 ± 0.0124

0.0351 ± 0.0126

0.0901 ± 0.0050

0.0295 ± 0.0095

Venus

0.0919 ± 0.0221

0.0399 ± 0.0128

0.102 ± 0.0212

0.0358 ± 0.0126

There is no significant difference in either maximum depth or wear volume between Expt, Control, and Venus (p>>0.05). There is a significant correlation (p<0.0001) between "maximum depth" and "wear volume" using either FTSS stylus (r = 0.732) or laser scanner (r = 0.615). The FTSS stylus gives more accurate surface roughness than the laser scanner. Conclusion: the experimental fluoride-releasing composite has wear resistance similar to the control and commercial composite. Supported by the Brown Foundation.

Back to Top