website: 86th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR

ABSTRACT: 0501  

Color Shifting of Resin Composites

R.D. PARAVINA, University of Texas Dental Branch at Houston, USA, G.N. FREY, University of Texas Houston/Health Science Center, USA, W.M. JOHNSTON, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA, and J.M. POWERS, Dental Consultants, Inc, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Objectives: To evaluate visual and instrumental color shifting of resin composites. Methods: Test shades were as follows: A1, A2 and A3 of Clearfil Majesty Esthetic (M); Filtek Supreme Plus (F); Artiste Nano Composite (A); and Estelite Sigma (E). Control shade was A3.5 of M. Disc-shaped specimens of all composites (D=10 mm, 2-mm thick, n=5) were made. “Dual” specimens: outer ring (outer D=10 mm, 4-mm thick, with inner ring holes of D=4 mm, 2-mm thick, n=5 per composite) were made of the control shade. Inner ring holes were filled with test shades. Color comparisons were performed by 5 evaluators using viewing booth. Color match was numerically rated from 1 (unacceptable mismatch) to 5 (perfect match). Color differences (deltaE*) were calculated based on spectroradiometer data. Fisher's PLSD intervals from ANOVA for comparison of means were calculated at the 0.05 level of significance. Results: Visual ratings and deltaE* values for single-composite test specimens vs. control specimens were compared with ratings for test shades vs. control shade in dual specimens. Differences between visual ratings (VDiff%) and deltaE* values (IDiff%) are listed in the table.

Comp/Shade

VDiff%

IDiff%

A/A1

-5

26

A/A2

-47

21

A/A3

-63

8

E/A1

132

61

E/A2

51

43

E/A3

1

8

F/A1

47

37

F/A2

13

46

F/A3

19

34

M/A1

64

21

M/A2

45

27

M/A3

52

37

Fisher's PLSD intervals (P<0.05) for comparisons of visual ratings among composites, shades and specimen types were 0.11, 0.09 and 0.08, respectively. Corresponding values for deltaE* values were 0.24, 0.21 and 0.17, respectively. Conclusions: Positive color shifting was recorded for composites E (least consistent by shade), F and M (most consistent by shade). Composites E and M exhibited the most pronounced VDiff%, followed by composites F and A, respectively. Supported in part by Kuraray America.

Back to Top