|
|
|
|
Dental Handpiece Force Transducer for Measuring Cutting Force
D. UGAI1, Y. HEO1, R. DELONG1, M.R. PINTADO2, and A.S.L. FOK1, 1University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA, 2Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomat & Biomechanics, Minneapolis, USA | Objective: To determine if a dental handpiece modified to act
as a force transducer can measure cutting forces of natural tooth structure. Methods:
A Midwest Quiet Air handpiece (Midwest Dental Supply) had four strain gauges
(120 Ohm, Vishay MicroMeasurements Group) bonded onto four machined sections on
the handpiece neck (top, bottom, right, left). Gauges on opposite sides connected
to form two half-bridge circuits that connected to a two-channel amplifier
(Type 2100, Vishay MicroMeasurements Group). Each amplifier channel linked to
a LabJack U12 data acquisition device (LabJack Corporation). Data points were
collected every 0.003 seconds with 12-bit resolution. The handpiece transducer
was calibrated in four directions (right, left, up, down) at intervals of 0.5N
from 0.5N to 5N. Three sets of natural teeth were cut using the handpiece
transducer: teeth mounted in dental stone (n=4); teeth with enamel removed
mounted in stone (n=4), and teeth mounted in Express STD (3M Dental Products)
(n=3). Teeth were scanned before and after cutting using the University of Minnesota contact profiler. Volume of material removed was calculated using
AnSur software (Copyright Regents University of Minnesota). Statistical
comparisons used an unpaired t-test. Results: Calibration curve linear
regressions had an r2=0.99. Mean cutting force in N (SD): enamel in
stone 1.23 (0.41); Enamel in Express 0.72 (0.13); Dentin in stone 0.72 (0.20).
The force to cut enamel in stone is significantly greater than that to cut
dentin (p=0.0004) and enamel in Express (p=0.0003). Cutting rate in mm3/second
(SD): Enamel in stone 0.093 (0.040); Enamel in Express 0.134 (0.058); Dentin in
stone 0.325 (0.126). Enamel cutting rates were not significantly different (p=0.25);
they were different from that of dentin (p=0.0004). Conclusions: A
handpiece modified to be a force transducer can measure cutting forces for
enamel and dentin, and it can distinguish between cutting enamel and dentin.
| Seq #298 - Devices for Measuring Different Biomaterials 1:45 PM-3:00 PM, Saturday, July 5, 2008 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Exhibit Hall D-E |
Back to the Dental Materials 9: Instruments and Equipment Program
|
|