website: 86th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR

ABSTRACT: 1828  

Grindability of Cast Ti-Al and Ti-Al-Cu Alloys

M. KOIKE, Q. GUO, J.P. FORD, and T. OKABE, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, TX, USA

Objective: This study evaluated the grindability of a series of Ti-Al and Ti-Al-Cu alloys. Methods: Three binary Ti-Al (5, 6 and 7 mass%) alloys and six ternary Ti-Al (5 or 6 mass%)-Cu (1, 3 and 5 mass%) alloys were prepared in an argon-arc melting furnace, and were cast using a centrifugal casting machine (Ticast Super R, Selec) into magnesia molds (Selevest CB, Selec). Pure Ti, CP Ti and Ti-6Al-4V (Ti64) were used as controls. Two sizes of castings (n=2) were made (3.0mm x 8.0mm x 30.0mm; 3.5mm x 8.5 mm x 30.5mm) so that the second castings were the same size as the first after removal of the a-case. Grindability (n=8) was evaluated as volume loss (mm3) after abrasion using a SiC wheel (703-120, Brasseler) (100 gf) at 1250 m/min. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (a=0.05). Results: The determined grindability [mean(S.D): mm3] are listed. Identical letters indicate no statistical differences (p>0.05).

Alloy

+a-case

-a-case

Alloy

+a-case

-a-case

5Al

2.74(0.80)ab

2.41(0.43)abc

5Al1Cu

3.57(0.72)bcd

3.47(0.88)cdef

5Al3Cu

5.73(1.09)e

4.42(1.13)f

5Al5Cu

4.99(0.69)ef

4.75(0.92)fg

6Al

3.27(1.08)bc

3.02(0.75)bcde

6Al1Cu

4.75(0.83)def

3.90(1.01)defg

6Al3Cu

5.09(0.97)ef

4.35(1.02)ef

6Al5Cu

5.01(0.64)ef

4.87(0.95)g

7Al

2.98(0.89)abc

2.87(0.82)bcd

Ti64

4.28(0.76)cde

3.71(1.08)cdefg

Pure Ti

1.83(0.70)a

1.74(0.60)ab

CP Ti

2.26(0.54)ab

1.24(0.42)a

The volume of the specimen with a-case removed tended to be greater than that of the specimen without the a-case. The volume of metal removed significantly increased with increases in Cu content (p<0.001). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in grindability among the three binary Ti-Al alloys (p>0.05). The volume of Ti-5Al+Cu and Ti-6Al+Cu removed was comparable to that of Ti-6Al-4V (p>0.05). Conclusions: The grindability of Ti-5Al+Cu and Ti-6Al+Cu was much better than that of CP Ti, due to their lower ductility resulting from the eutectoid component, a-Ti/Ti2Cu, which promoted effective chip formation. Partially funded by NIH/NIDCR grant DE11787.

Back to Top