|
|
|
|
Anesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine with epinephrine in maxillary infiltration
M. FRANZ-MONTAN1, A.R. SILVA2, J. RANALI1, F.C. GROPPO1, E.D. PAULA3, and M.C. VOLPATO1, 1Universidade Estadual de Campinas- UNICAMP, Piracicaba, Brazil, 2Universidade Estadual de Campinas- UNICAMP, Brazil, 3State University of Campinas – Biological Institute, Brazil | Objectives: To evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine with
epinephrine and the effects on the cardiovascular system after maxillary
infiltration. Methods: In this blinded crossover study, forty healthy
volunteers received, in different sessions, 1.8mL of 2% lidocaine with
1:100,000 epinephrine (Lido100) and 0.5% ropivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine
(Ropi200) in the buccal fold of the maxillary right canine region. Anesthesia
success, onset and duration of pulpal anesthesia were evaluated in the lateral
incisor, canine, 1st and 2nd premolar with electric
stimulation. Gingival and lip anesthesia was evaluated by pinprick test. Pain
during anesthetic injection was recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Arterial pressure and heart rate changes were monitored: before (1), during (2)
right after (3) and 5-min after (4) local anesthesia. Results: The results
(mean±SD) are shown in the table. No statistically significant differences
(p>0.05) were observed between Lido100 and Ropi200, except for duration of
gingival and lip anesthesia which were longer with the use of Ropi200. The
cardiovascular parameters remained stable (p<0.05) and within the normal
range.
| Solution | Lateral incisor | Canine | 1st Premolar | 2nd Premolar | Gingiva | Lip | | Anesthesia success rate (%) | Lido100 | 55 | 95 | 85 | 67.5 | 100 | 100 | | Ropi200 | 15 | 75 | 70 | 62.5 | 100 | 100 | | | | | | | | | | | Onset of anesthesia (min) | Lido100 | 4.2 (±0.9) | 2.8 (±0.3) | 2.5 (±0.2) | 2.8 (±0.3) | 0 | 0 | | Ropi200 | 4.6 (±0.7) | 3.2 (±0.3) | 3.3 (±0.3) | 3.5 (±0.6) | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | Duration of anesthesia (min) | Lido100 | 26.7 (±6.7) | 36.9 (±5.9) | 39.6 (±5.5) | 31.5 (±4.7) | 134.8 (±8.8) | 198.4 (±9.2) | | Ropi200 | 4.6 (±0.7) | 43.4 (±6.8) | 45.8 (±6.2) | 34.5 (±4.6) | 272.5 (±18.4) * | 407.7 (±18.8) * | | | | | | | | | | | VAS | Lido100 | 28.9 (±3.3) | Ropi200 | 30.8 (±3.9) |
Conclusion: There
is no advantage in the use of 0.5% ropivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine for
maxillary infiltration, except in procedures in which post surgical pain from
soft tissues is expected. Supported by FAPESP 2006/00121-9, 2006/53255-2.
| Seq #304 - Dental Anesthesiology Posters II 1:45 PM-3:00 PM, Saturday, July 5, 2008 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Exhibit Hall D-E |
Back to the Dental Anesthesiology Research Program
|
|