website: 86th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR

ABSTRACT: 2959  

“Low-Cost Simulation” Effectiveness for Psychomotor Learning in a Complex Model

S.K. GRAYDEN, M.E. MCLEAN, P.A. BAUER, M. FITZGERALD, E. MASLOWSKI, and S.C. BAYNE, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA

Click on images to view full size.

Introduction:  University of Michigan is evaluating a series of “low-cost simulations” (LCS) focused on separating cognitive-versus-motor learning events in preclinical operative dentistry.  LCS pilot experiments (IRB-approved) use 3D computer-interactive images for previewing, conceptualizing (cognitive), and simulating (motor) cavity preparation.  Currently, LCS only simulates 2 degrees-of-freedom (dof= x-y dimensions, limited z) versus 4 dof (x-y-z, tilt) when an actual handpiece is used to prepare a tooth.  The following study utilized LCS to model a complex learning event.
 
Objective:  To evaluate LCS training effects (both cognitive and motor) on subsequent DDS1 preclinical performance on “first attempt” of Class-1 cavity preparation (Typodont tooth) as assessed by size, shape, and location qualities. 
 
Methods:  Students used computer-based 3D-simulation (ZBrush, V3.1, Pixologic) to train for Class-I preparation 30-minutes prior to first Typodont tooth preparation in lab.  Performance was rated (5 [best] to 1[worst]) for major preparation errors (see attachment) involving (a) size [8 sites], (b) shape [6 sites], and (c) location [8 sites].  Comparisons were made within groups (small-letter superscripts) and among groups (capital-letter superscripts) using ANOVA (p≤0.05).
 

Preparation Groups:

  Learning Levels:

 

                       Ratings Scale

 

Cognitive

Motor

n=

Size (x±sd)

Shape (x±sd)

Location (x±sd)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LCS: Computer

High

2-dof

32

4.40±0.72ab,A

4.77±0.50a,A

4.07±0.91b,A

LCS: In-Lab

High

4-dof

32

2.72±0.85a,B

2.91±1.03a,B

2.63±0.91a,B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control: In-Lab

High

4-dof

71

2.73±0.91a,B

3.08±1.04a,B

2.46±1.00a,B

Results:  LCS computer and LCS in-lab groups were different (p<0.0001).  LCS in-lab and control in-lab groups were the same (p>0.05).  The inference was that 2-dof motor skill was rate-limiting for learning performance.  The trend of ratings for size, shape, and location in all groups were the same with only minor differences.
 
ConclusionsPilot data suggested that 4-dof was crucial for successful LCS in complex psycho-motor learning.
 
Acknowledgments: UM-3D Lab, Pixologic Software.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to Top