Objective: Clinical reports indicate potential problems with veneer porcelain
fracture on zirconia frameworks. The purpose of this study was to use thermal
shock testing to evaluate the crack resistance of the different surface
treatment of the zirconia veneered with different kind of porcelains Methods: Yttria stabilized zirconia blocks (Vita) were sectioned into discs
approximately 2 mm thick and sintered according to the manufacturer's
instructions in the recommended furnace. A total of 144 specimens were randomly
divided into three groups. For each group, a different surface treatment was
applied: (1) No treatment (2) Grinding using a 120 grit
diamond disc with a 0.0034 kg/mm2 load (3) Grinding then heat treatment at
1000°C, 15 minutes. Four types of veneering porcelains were used: VM9, Lava
Ceram, NobelRondo and Noritake CZR. Each type was fired according to the
manufacturer's recommendations. Specimens were thermal shocked by heating to
90°C and then quenched in ice water. Specimens were dried at room-temperature
and replaced in the furnace at 90°C until they reached equilibrium. Porcelain
crazing was examined by:(1)
Visual examination. (2) Microscope (10X) (3) UV- light inspection of
fluorescent dye penetration If failure was not observed the specimens were
reheated to a temperature 10°C higher, quenched, and re-examined. This was
repeated at 10°C higher each time until failure was observed in each specimen. Results: Table
1: Weighted Mean Temperature of Failure.
Porcelain Type | No Treatment | Grinding | Grinding and Heating | Total Mean | VM9 | 198°C | 163°C | 215°C | 192°C | Lava Ceram | 174°C | 148°C | 187°C | 170°C | NobelRondo | 156°C | 140°C | 145°C | 147°C | Noritake CZR | 160°C | 144°C | 172°C | 158°C | Total Mean | 172°C | 148°C | 180°C | |
ANOVA and Tukey showed there were significant
differences among porcelain type and surface treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Grinding lowers crazing resistance. Grinding
followed by a heat treatment improves crazing resistance.
|