website: 86th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR

ABSTRACT: 0139  

Impact of photo-activation methods on resin composite properties

M.B. LOPES1, R.R. MORAES2, A. GONINI-JÚNIOR1, and E. PIVA3, 1University of North Parana, Londrina - PR, Brazil, 2State University of Campinas, Piracicaba - SP, Brazil, 3Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas - RS, Brazil

Impact of photo-activation methods on resin composite properties

Objectives: this study investigated the impact of different photo-activation methods on the properties of a model resin composite. Methods: the resin phase of the model material was composed of Bis-GMA (50wt%), TEGDMA (50wt%), camphorquinone (0.4wt%), dimethyl-p-toluidine (0.8wt%) and hydroquinone (0.1wt%); the inorganic phase was composed of silanated strontium glass fillers (75wt%). The following photo-activation methods were tested: high-intensity continuous (HIC=500mW/cm2 for 20s), medium-intensity continuous (MIC=250mW/cm2 for 40s), low-intensity continuous (LIC=100mW/cm2 for 100s), pulse-delay-1min (PD-1min=100mW/cm2 for 5s + 1min interval + 500mW/cm2 for 19s), pulse-delay-3min (PD-3min=100mW/cm2 for 5s + 3min interval + 500mW/cm2 for 19s). Irradiance was performed using a halogen curing unit. Degree of conversion (DC) was evaluated using infrared spectroscopy. Flexural strength (FS) and modulus (FM) were obtained in a mini three-point bending test. Cross-link density (CLD) was estimated through weight alteration of cylindrical specimens after immersion in chloroform and calculation of swelling coefficient (a). Data were separately submitted to ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test (5%). Results: Means±SD for all analyzes are shown in the Table (distinct letters indicate significant differences for each property).

Method

DC (%)

FS (MPa)

FM (MPa)

a (g/mL)

HIC

50.6±2.8a

174±29a

918±124a

0.19±0.08c

MIC

49.8±2.7a

144±34ab

748±107b

0.22±0.04bc

LIC

50.1±2.1a

130±35b

716±121b

0.25±0.02b

PD–1min

43.9±4.8b

138±31b

730±108b

0.25±0.01b

PD–3min

51.7±5.2a

111±13b

672±97b

0.30±0.02a

Conclusions: The different methods significantly interfered with the properties of the resin composite. In general, HIC showed the best outcomes for all properties, while MIC and LIC showed similar results to PD-1min and PD-3min. PD-1min and PD-3min showed lower FS, FM and lower CLD than HIC.

Back to Top