Hertizan Contact Stress-Strain
Response of Enamel
Carlos AO Fernandes, Marinee
Cabrera, Alisa Leesavan, Nelson RFA Silva, Van P Thompson.
Objectives: This study evaluated the macroscopic stress
strain response of enamel to Hertzian contact with variation in indenter
diameter and loading rate.
Methods: Third human molars were
cut into halves from mesial to distal obtaining specimens at both the buccal and
lingual sites. All samples were then embedded in acrylic resin (PMMA) and
polished to expose flat enamel surfaces and lightly etched (5 sec, 10%
phosphoric acid). Samples were triangular wave loaded at 0.5, 10 or 500 N/sec
over a range of loads. Indenters were WC spheres (r=1.59 or 3.18 mm). After
loading, the specimens were observed under a stereomicroscope and the indent
measurements were recorded for a/r (contact radius/indenter radius)
determination. Contact stress and contact strain were calculated. ANOVA and
group comparisons were determined.
Results: At loads of 150 N and above with the small indenter
ring cracks and radial cracks were observed. The radial cracks were seen to
originate from the DEJ when specimens were sectioned. With the larger indenter
no cracking was observed. Contact modulus for loads and rates employed are
below:
| Contact Modulus (Gpa) (r=3.18 mm) | Contact Modulus (Gpa) (r=1.59 mm) | Contact Modulus (GPa) (r=1.59) | Load (N) / Rate | 10 N/sec (n=15/) | 0.5 N/sec (n=8/) | 500 N/sec (n=8/) | 50 | 26.7* | | | 150 | 16.4* | 12.3# | 16.20# | 200 | | 13.5 | 13.7 | 250 | | 10.7^ | 16.25^ |
*, #, ^ Significant difference (p<0.05)
Conclusion: The Hertzian contact modulus of enamel is
strongly influenced by indenter load and radius. Small indenters create damage
lowering contact modulus. Contact modulus is load rate dependent
|