|
|
|
|
Polymerization Shrinkage Stress in Composite-resin Restorations Associated Liner/base
L. OLIVEIRA1, S. DUARTE, Jr.2, C. ARAUJO3, and A. ABRAHAO3, 1Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 2State University of Sao Paulo, Araraquara, Brazil, 3Federal University of Uberlandia, Brazil | Objectives: The aim
of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of liner or base materials under
composite-resin restoration to reduce the stress resulting from polymerization
shrinkage and loading. Methods: Four groups were assigned: G1) Control -
composite-resin restoration (Z250-3M ESPE); G2) 0.5mm flowable-composite liner
(Filtek Flow-FF, 3M ESPE) + composite-resin restoration (Z250); G3) 0.5mm
resin-modified-glass-ionomer liner (Vitrebond-VT, 3M ESPE) + composite-resin
restoration (Z250), and G4) Base with resin-modified-glass-ionomer (VT) +
composite-resin restoration (Z250). The study was divided in three phases:
Photoelasticity (P1), Tensilometry (P2) and Finite Element-FE (P3). P1 - Photoelastic
models (n=7) for all groups were used to determine polymerization shrinkage
stress. The Maximal Shear Stress (tmax) was calculated along adhesive
interface and statistically analyzed (ANOVA, Tukey's, p<0.05). P2 – The polymerization
shrinkage stress was determined using a tensilometer. The materials (M1-Z250, M2-FF
e M3-VT) were inserted into 2mm space, between two dentin bovine cylindrical
bases, which one was connected to a load cell (n=7). Results were statistically
analyzed (ANOVA, Tukey's, p<0.05). P3 - The polymerization shrinkage stress
resulting from phases P1 and P2 were used to create a 2D FE model in
combination with occlusal loading. Loading conditions: I - vertical (occlusal
surface/60N); II - lateral (buccal cusp/30N); III - lateral (lingual cusp/30N).
Von Mises-se,
Tangencial-st and
Normal-sn stresses
in bonded interface were calculated.
Results: tmax
in
Phase P1 were G1<G2<G3<G4 (p<0,001). Polymerization shrinkage stress
in Phase P2 were M1<M2<M3 (p<0,001). FE analysis (se, st and sn) in
Phase 3 showed higher stress in adhesive interface after loading. The maximum
stress value found for adhesive interface were G1<G2<G3<G4.
Conclusions: Using a
liner
or base material under composite-resin restoration is not likely to reduce the effects
of stresses produced by polymerization shrinkage or loading.
| Seq #188 - Polymerization of Resin-based Materials 2:00 PM-3:15 PM, Friday, July 4, 2008 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Exhibit Hall D-E |
Back to the Dental Materials 6: Polymer-based Materials - Physical Properties and Performance Program
|
|