website: 86th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR

ABSTRACT: 3304  

Postsurgical Bone Level and Density around Implant by Digital Radiographs

K. TAKAHASHI1, H. TSUGAYASU1, M. SAITOH1, T. MAIDA1, E. NAKAYAMA2, T. KAKU2, and Y. ABIKO1, 1Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Sapporo, Japan, 2Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Ishikari, Japan

Objectives: Bone level and density around dental implant is important factor for prediction of the prognosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate post-surgical bone level and density adjacent to submerged dental implant by digitized conventional radiographs and subtraction images. Methods: The radiographs taken for seventy-eight implants (32 implants of 3.25mm diameter, 46 implants of 4mm diameter; Spline, Zimmer dental) were used. The radiographs were obtained at three time periods; at the time immediately after first surgery, and 3 and 6 months after the surgery before the second surgery. The radiographs were digitized into a personal computer by a scanner. The images were manipulated by EMAGO/Advanced 5.x software (Oral Diagnostic system, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and linear and logarithmic digital subtraction images were produced. The logarithmic subtraction was enhanced with the use of a filter. The bone level and density around implant was assessed in the subtraction images. The subtraction image was analyzed by NIH image. The data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Differences between experimental groups were considered statistically significant at the p<0.05 levels. Results: The bone loss was observed around the implants at 3 or 6 month after first surgery. The bone levels around the implants were significantly lower at 3 or 6 month after first surgery than at immediately after first surgery. The implants of 4mm diameter showed significantly higher bone levels than the implants of 3.25 mm diameter both at 3 and 6 months after the first surgery. Conclusions: The results indicate that the implant having a larger diameter may lose less amount of bone around the implant after the first surgery.

Back to Top