website: 86th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR

ABSTRACT: 1201  

Load Fatigue Performance of Implant-Ceramic Abutment Combinations

Q.H. NGUYEN, Alexandra Hospital, Singapore, Singapore, K.B.C. TAN, National University of Singapore, Singapore, and J.I. NICHOLLS, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

The mechanical properties and functional load performance of implant-metal abutments combinations have been studied widely. However, the rotational load fatigue performance of the newly introduced ceramic implant abutments has not been reported. Objectives: This study investigated the load fatigue performance of four implant systems and their corresponding zirconia abutments at manufacturer's recommended torque levels. Methods: 3 diameters (Narrow, Regular, Wide) of Replace Select (RS) and Branemark (BM) systems (Nobel Biocare (NB)) and 2 diameters (4.1mm, 5.0mm) of Osseotite-NT (3i.E) and Osseotite-NT Certain (3i.C) systems (Implant Innovations (3i)) were used to constitute 10 implant–abutment test-groups. The abutments tested were Procera-zirconia (NB), Zireal-posts and Certain-ZiReal-posts (3i). n=5. A rotational load fatigue machine applied a sinusoidally varying tensile-compressive 21N load to specimens at a 450 angle to produce an effective bending moment of 35Ncm at test frequency 14Hz. The number of cycles to failure was recorded with the upper limit set at 5x106 cycles. Results: Abutment fractures were observed in narrow, regular and wide diameter groups of NB systems and in the 4.1mm groups of 3i (4,7,2 and 5 specimens respectively for total 18 events). Implant fractures were recorded for RS narrow and regular diameter groups and 4.1mm 3i.E (3,3, and 1 specimens respectively). Damage of implant platform was observed predominantly in BM groups. Abutment screw fractures were recorded for Goldtite (3i), Torqtite and titanium(NB) screws (6,4 and 6 specimens respectively). 29 out of the total 50 specimens failed (58%). 2-way ANOVA revealed no significant difference between the implant systems but significant differences between diameters. Subsequent 1-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences between the 10 implant-abutment test-groups. Conclusions: Rotational load fatigue performance of zirconia abutments is dependant on the cross-sectional dimension. Implant, abutment and screw failures were all observed. Failure mode varied according to system-specific design characteristics.

Back to Top