Objectives:
Poorly fitting frameworks are the most common reason for complications in the life-time survival of dental
implants. This study evaluated and compared the precision of fit of CAD/CAM
one-piece zirconia fixed complete denture frameworks and cast frameworks. Methods: Ten Procera zirconia
substructures were fabricated using a CAD/CAM technique. Five cast implant
frameworks of high noble metal (Palladium-Gold) were fabricated by 5 different
dental laboratories. Laboratories were instructed to use their preferred
technique to obtain the optimum fit. Using a Zeiss Coordinate Measuring Machine
and CALYPSO measuring software positions of implant replicas in the gypsum
model were determined. Positions were then matched to the measured positions of
the framework cylinders.
All samples were analyzed
measuring the position of the replicas in the A translation matrix calculated
by the rigid body transformation method. This method translates the cylinder
positions and minimizes the point-to-point distance between the two data sets.
The best fit between the replica and the framework was completed by making each
corresponding cylinder the origin (0,0,0). This was done systematically until
there were six best fit data sets from which the minimum gap data set was
chosen. All the data were transformed into the coordinate system:
Cylinder#1(0,0,0), #6(x,0,0), #3(x,y,0) prior to making comparisons.
Results: The following are the Centroid, MaxGap, MiniGap
and the maximum minus minimum angular gap measurements between the implant
replicas and the corresponding zirconia and cast framework cylinders.
Method Centroid MaxGap MiniGap Maximum-Minimum
Cast 21.3 25.6 17.1 8.5
Zirconia 8.9 10.6 7.2 3.4
Conclusions: CAD/CAM one-piece zirconia fixed complete
denture frameworks provide an improved precision of fit over that of cast
frameworks
<>Supported by NobelBiocare/ University of Michigan Center
for Excellence
|