V. ROSA1, M.M. PINTO2, C.C. GONZAGA3, P.F. CESAR3, and H.N. YOSHIMURA4, 1University São Paulo, Passo Fundo - RS, Brazil, 2University of São Paulo, São Paulo - SP, Brazil, 3University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, 4Institute of Technological Research of the State of São Paulo, Brazil |
Objectives: determine
the effect of ion exchange in the parameters of slow crack growth – SCG (n and
sf0), Weibull parameters (m and s0) and
construct the Strength–Probability–Time (SPT) diagram of a leucite-reinforced
feldspathic ceramic.
Methods: 140 disk-shaped
ceramic specimens (12mm in diameter X 1mm-thick) were fabricated according to
manufacturer's instructions, polished through 1µm and divided into 2 groups: GC
(control) and GI (submitted to an ion exchange procedure using KNO3
paste at 470° for 15 min). SCG parameters were determined by biaxial flexural
strength test in artificial saliva at 37°C using 5 constant stress rates
(n=10): 102, 101, 100, 10-1, 10-2
MPa/s. Additional 20 specimens of each group were tested at 1 MPa/s in the same
apparatus to determine Weibull parameters. Using the data obtained in these
tests, the SPT diagram was constructed using the least-squares fit of the
tensile strength data versus probability of failure.
Results: Mean values
of m and s0 (95% confidence interval) and n and sf0
(± standard deviations) were: 13.8 (10.0 - 18.8), 60.4 (58.5 - 62.2), 24.1 ±
2.5 and 58.1 ± 0.01 for GC and 7.4 (5.3 - 10.1), 136.8 (129.1 - 144.7), 36.7 ±
7.3, 127.9 ± 0.01 for GI, respectively. Fracture stress (MPa) calculated using
the SPT diagram for lifetime of 1 day, 1 and 10 years for 5% failure
probability were 31.85, 24.94 and 22.69 for GC and 62.36, 48.82 and 44.37 for
GI.
Conclusion: for this
porcelain, the ion exchange process resulted in an increase in strength (as
represented by sf0 and s0) and in the
resistance to SCG (n). However, the material's reliability decreased, since
there was a decrease in the Weibull modulus. In all lifetimes analyzed,
fracture stresses at 5% failure probability were approximately 50% higher for
the ion treated group compared to the control.
|