|
|
|
|
Changes in Color, Translucency and Gloss of Aged Resin Composites
R.D. PARAVINA1, M.S. ELDIWANY1, and J.M. POWERS2, 1University of Texas Dental Branch at Houston, USA, 2Dental Consultants, Inc, Ann Arbor, MI, USA | Objectives: To evaluate
the effect of accelerated aging on color, translucency parameter (TP) and gloss
of resin composites. Methods: The effect of
accelerating aging (150 kJ/m2) on color, translucency parameter (TP)
and gloss of composite specimens (D=10 mm, 2-mm thick, n=5 per shade) was
analyzed for A1, A2 and A3 shades of the following composites: Clearfil Majesty
Esthetic (M); Filtek Supreme Plus (F); and Artiste Nano Composite (A).
Specimens were polished for 40s using PoGo one-step polishers. Color and TP
were recorded using a spectrophotometer; gloss (GU) was determined using
small-area glossmeter. A deltaE*=2.7 was set as the color acceptability
threshold. Means and standard deviations were determined and data were analyzed
by analysis of variance and Fisher's PLSD intervals at the 0.05 level of
significance. Results:
Color
difference (deltaE*) between baseline and after aging, translucency parameter
at baseline (TPB) and after aging (TPA), and gloss
retention in percentages (GR%), are listed in the Table.
Composite/Shade | deltaE* | TPB | TPA | GR% | A/A1 | 2.7(0.4) | 5.3(0.5) | 4.8(0.6) | 86.8 | A/A2 | 4.8(0.5) | 5.1(0.5) | 4.7(0.5) | 97.8 | A/A3 | 6.5(0.9) | 3.8(0.5) | 3.3(0.5) | 93.8 | F/A1 | 1.4(0.3) | 5.2(0.5) | 4.8(0.7) | 93.7 | F/A2 | 1.4(0.2) | 6.0(0.5) | 5.6(0.7) | 96.1 | F/A3 | 0.7(0.3) | 5.4(0.5) | 5.2(0.3) | 96.2 | M/A1 | 1.5(0.4) | 6.1(0.5) | 5.7(0.5) | 78.9 | M/A2 | 1.6(0.5) | 5.9(0.5) | 5.6(0.7) | 86.6 | M/A3 | 2.0(1.0) | 6.1(0.5) | 5.9(0.9) | 87.6 |
ANOVA showed significant
differences among composites, shades, and
their interactions (p<0.0001). Fisher's PLSD interval (p<0.05) for
comparisons of deltaE* values was 0.41. Fisher's PLSD intervals for TP at
baseline and after aging and gloss at baseline and after aging were 0.53, 0.47,
3.3 and 3.9, respectively. Conclusions: Composites F and M exhibited
color stability below the acceptability threshold. Composite M was the most
translucent. Translucency of the tested composites decreased after aging. Gloss
retention was highest with composite F. Supported in part by Kuraray America.
| Seq #169 - Resin Composite Mechanical Properties 10:45 AM-12:15 PM, Friday, July 4, 2008 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Room 803A |
Back to the Dental Materials 6: Polymer-based Materials - Physical Properties and Performance Program
|
|