website: 86th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR

ABSTRACT: 2431  

Differences in providing individualized caries prevention treatment across Dental PBRN

J.L. RILEY III1, V.V. GORDAN1, E. GIBSON1, L.R. ROQUE2, J.L. FELLOWS3, J.S. RICHMAN4, G.H. GILBERT4, and F.T. DPBRN COLLABORATIVE GROUP4, 1University of Florida, Gainesville, USA, 2Private Practice in Vero Beach, FL, USA, 3Center for Health Research Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA, 4The University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA

Objective: To identity practice characteristics associated with providing individualized caries prevention treatment in the Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN; www.DPBRN.org). DPBRN is a group of outpatient dental practices affiliated to investigate research questions across 5 regions: AL/MS: Alabama/Mississippi, FL/GA: Florida/Georgia, HP/MN: dentists employed by HealthPartners and in private practice from the Minneapolis, Minnesota area, PDA: Permanente Dental Associates in cooperation with Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, and SK: Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Although caries prevention treatment may be a part of the treatment planning process, the extent to which practicing dentists provide individualized caries prevention treatment is poorly documented.

Methods: A survey was sent to all DPBRN member dentists who reported doing at least some restorative dentistry in their practices (n=915). The survey asked if caries risk assessment was used in their practices and what percentage of their patients: 1) are interested in an individualized caries prevention regimen and 2) are provided with individualized preventive treatment. Differences in frequencies were tested across a range of practice characteristics that included region, gender of the dentist, and practice model.

Results: 532 members responded. Caries-risk assessment was most common among practices where the dentist was female, with 51% of female dentists using individualized preventive treatment on more than 50% of their patients, compared to 34% for male dentists (p< .001). Having an individualized caries prevention regimen was most often preferred by patients of female dentists (p< .001), pediatric dentists (p< .001), and by practices in SK and PDA regions (p< .001). There were few practice-related differences in the belief that a dentist's assessment of caries risk can predict future caries.

Conclusion: The use of an individualized caries prevention program was most preferred by female dentists and their patients. Support: DE 16746, 16747.

Back to Top